Which of the following statements are most accurate when performing archival or purging of work items? (Choose Two)

• A. Archiving or purging requires enabling the ImportExport Agent
• B. Purging deletes the work items from the work tables and all other associated tables while archiving does not delete the work items and all other associated tables in the active database
• C. When archiving, the entries in the declare index tables are also exported
• D. Both Archiving and Purging exports the data into a zip file which can be imported in another PRPC instance
• E. The production system can be configured to retry the Archival or purging strategy if the first attempt is unsuccessful

A Purchase Order application is built with PRPC. Cases include the following:
- VendorFulfillment
- InventoryFulfillment
- PurchaseRequest
(each purchase request includes either a VendorFulfillment or InventoryFulfillment)
What are the likely classes for these case types and what are the likely case relationships between them? (Choose One)

• A. MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-PurchaseRequest (not a subcase) MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-VendorFulfillment (subcase of MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work- PurchaseRequest) MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-InventoryFulfillment (subcase of MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work- PurchaseRequest)
• B. MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-PurchaseRequest (not a subcase) MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-PurchaseRequest-VendorFulfillment (subcase of MyCo-FW-PRApp- Work-PurchaseRequest) MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-PurchaseRequest-InventoryFulfillment (subcase of MyCo-FW-PRApp- Work-PurchaseRequest)
• C. MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-PurchaseRequest (subcase of MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work) MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-VendorFulfillment (subcase of MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work- PurchaseRequest) MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-InventoryFulfillment (subcase of MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work- PurchaseRequest)
• D. MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-PurchaseRequest (not a subcase) MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-VendorFulfillment (subcase of MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work) MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work-InventoryFulfillment (subcase of MyCo-FW-PRApp-Work)

Review the following requirement:
A home loan application has a new requirement to track changes to the following properties during the lifecycle of the loan process (which can be many weeks and allows for updates to these properties at different points throughout the process).
Properties to Track:
- Loan Amount
- Home Value
- Downpayment
The new requirement is to track all changes to these properties and send the previous value, current value and operator who made the change to a web service used for fraud detection. A second requirement is to spin-off a loan review process if the loan amount changes by more than 20%. This review process occurs in parallel to the primary process.
Given the above requirements which of the following approaches is most appropriate? (Choose One)

• A. Use a declare trigger to check for changes to the properties and copy the previous values to 3 additional properties. In the activity called by the trigger execute the web services and determine, using a when rule, if the 20% change has occurred, if so execute the review flow
• B. Use the property auditing landing page and its configuration options to track the property changes and call the appropriate web service. Also, create an additional declare on-change rule to check for the 20% change and start the review process
• C. Use a declare on-change rule to track all of the properties and execute the web services. Also utilize the process override functionality, in conjunction with a when rule to check for the 20% change, to execute the review process
• D. Use a declare on-change rule to look for changes in the 3 properties and then execute the appropriate web service. Use a separate trigger to track the change in loan amount and start the review process flow if the change is more than 20%

The home loan application uses a PRPC SOAP connector to get the credit score of the applicant from an external webservice hosted by a third party company. The application determines the risk level for the applicant based on this score. The underwriting group handling these cases must be able to specify the risk level that is appropriate to a score band.
When the CSR is working on the case, the application invokes the SOAP connector to get the credit score and the external service returns the credit score of the applicant. However, since the information is confidential, it is required to display the risk level of the applicant based on their score and not the actual score.
Given the above requirements which of the following approaches is most appropriate? (Choose One)

• A. Build a new service on top of the third party service that returns the risk level based on the credit score. Create a PRPC connector that connects with the new service instead of connecting with the third party service
• B. Create a node level declare page that has the credit score to credit rating level predefined using an activity and a data transform that is used to set relationships. At runtime when the service returns the score loop through the declare page to get the rating level of the applicant
• C. Create a thread level declare page that has the credit score to credit rating level predefined using an activity and a data transform that is used to set relationships. At runtime when the service returns the score loop through the declare page to get the rating level of the applicant
• D. Create a PRPC connector to retrieve the credit score when appropriate. Create a new decision table or tree that returns risk level for the credit score range. Write a declare expression on the credit score property to call the decision rule
• E. Create a new decision table or tree that returns risk level for the credit score range. In the connector activity rule add a step to invoke the decision rule to get the credit rating level